Jenny Crusie Tears Miss Snark A New One
Jenny Crusie has now unloaded both barrels at Miss Snark. Her concluding thoughts:
Anonymous blogs that make incorrect statements about the industry without insight or illumination, fueled by ego and tainted by unprofessionalism, ridiculing writers to silence them by threatening them with the end of their careers. Oh, please.
I've never spent any time playing the "Is Miss Snark an agent or just a poseur?" game, since I find such speculation a waste of time. Miss Snark purports to be an agent and dispenses her expert opinions about agenting, publishing, and writing accordingly. Very well, then. Miss Snark's opinions should be judged in that context.
On balance, I agree with Jenny Crusie. I'm not fond of anonymity. I don't like it when writers and commentators use it. I'm suspicious of "unnamed sources" when used by journalists. If you're not willing to sign your statements, they lose credibility. Other than to create a sense of mystery, as Joe Klein did with his novel Primary Colors, writers use anonymity as a shield against retaliation for unpopular opinions. It's not a courageous stance and it doesn't inspire confidence in the integrity of your writing.
It is the position of Miss Snark and others that writers should never criticize an agent or editor in a public forum and perhaps not even in private, lest you be blacklisted.
Miss Snark is forgetting the major tenet upon which all publishing rests: If the book makes money, the publisher will go the extra mile, the extra kilometer, the extra continent for it even if the author is the offspring of Godzilla and The Thing. And if the book doesn’t sell, the author can be Susie Nice Girl and the publisher will dump her in a ditch and spread somebody else’s remaindered copies over her body.In any relationship where there is an imbalance of power, whether it is employer-employee or publisher-writer, there is a strong tendency on the part of the worker to accept the decisions and tolerate the behavior of their employer no matter how wrong you feel they are because you need the job. I think that everyone must be judicious and aware of the particular situation they are in, but I don't believe writers should never reply to any agent or editor or criticize them in public for fear of being ostracized.